tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post8113710729942352337..comments2023-12-21T00:14:07.455+00:00Comments on <center>EASTCLIFF RICHARD</center>: Ramsgate Prices Soar As Airport PlummetsRichard Eastcliffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10514972891192411470noreply@blogger.comBlogger57125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-89530301348614668002014-03-26T21:29:18.466+00:002014-03-26T21:29:18.466+00:00The end.The end.Richard Eastcliffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10514972891192411470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-40827192160865620252014-03-24T12:56:41.629+00:002014-03-24T12:56:41.629+00:00Tim, please try to get switched on. Everyone arou...Tim, please try to get switched on. Everyone around the blogs knows who you are and recognises your style and repetitive comments. You talk of people being obsessed with Tim, but you are obsessed with anyone who uses a name and criticises you.<br /><br />Why not try and help her indoors with the restaurant instead of sitting on your fat the whole time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-55639419199470501172014-03-24T11:52:49.589+00:002014-03-24T11:52:49.589+00:00Whatever turns you on, Nemesis.Whatever turns you on, Nemesis.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-47551335471717505482014-03-24T11:35:00.521+00:002014-03-24T11:35:00.521+00:00Anon 11:28,
You stay focussed on whatever you cho...Anon 11:28,<br /><br />You stay focussed on whatever you choose . For my part I will stay focussed on you. Nemesisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-33135262540534703532014-03-24T11:28:38.501+00:002014-03-24T11:28:38.501+00:00You may be right, Nemesis; I have absolutely no id...You may be right, Nemesis; I have absolutely no idea. But the issue here isn't your, or my, identity - or indeed anyone else's. It is the actions and behaviour of Town Councillor Epps. We should stay focussed on that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-43376967076700900052014-03-24T10:10:40.286+00:002014-03-24T10:10:40.286+00:00Anon 9:54,
You have already met me. You know me. ...Anon 9:54,<br /><br />You have already met me. You know me. We have spoken. Think.Nemesisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-68845572712278247052014-03-24T09:54:37.655+00:002014-03-24T09:54:37.655+00:00Gosh, Nemesis, I look forward to meeting you then....Gosh, Nemesis, I look forward to meeting you then.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-4711211923571885782014-03-24T09:54:15.412+00:002014-03-24T09:54:15.412+00:00My remark was addresed to you 5:16.My remark was addresed to you 5:16.Nemesisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-30386279243826709612014-03-24T09:52:49.833+00:002014-03-24T09:52:49.833+00:00But I know who you are, I know you.But I know who you are, I know you.Nemesisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-29595287155517123312014-03-24T09:16:46.885+00:002014-03-24T09:16:46.885+00:00When all else fails, fall back on the old chestnut...When all else fails, fall back on the old chestnut of criticising anonymous blogging, eh, Town Councillor Epps?<br /><br />And all else has failed you - demonstrated by your foul-mouthed response. You said you had made no comment about the reports of John Worrow's arrest last year, but the evidence shows your claim to be completely untrue. Moreover, it shows you to be a fearful gossip, who gets some sort of peculiar titillation with his cronies over what you - and no doubt they - see as "juicy" news.<br /><br />This makes you look pretty low, Epps. Small wonder politicians have such an appalling reputation. In your case, you earn that reputation with distinction.<br /><br />And no, my name isn't Tim - or John Worrow. You don't know me, and - thankfully - I don't know you. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-11009186081061740302014-03-23T20:02:15.473+00:002014-03-23T20:02:15.473+00:00Why does Epps assume everyone is Tim? The Anon pos...Why does Epps assume everyone is Tim? The Anon post has confirmed he isn't Tim.<br /><br />And the Anon post simply detailed how Epps had repeatedly referred to the Worrow case and then claimed he hadn't. We can see Anon is right.<br /><br />We are at fault electing idiots like Epps. At least he won't be standing again and is back to being just another loudmouth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-18617673137708507032014-03-23T19:31:17.016+00:002014-03-23T19:31:17.016+00:00Tim, go f**k yourself, there's a good chap. I...Tim, go f**k yourself, there's a good chap. I have nothing to answer to you on. If, however, you want to come out in the open and stop hiding behind your anonymous tag, then more than happy to have a debate.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17927801279761727020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-48940081716403344382014-03-23T18:58:52.960+00:002014-03-23T18:58:52.960+00:00Town Councillor Epps, you have shown that you'...Town Councillor Epps, you have shown that you're not as effective at covering your tracks and blunders as some of your political allies. Now why not answer the points I put to you in my 1.02 pm post today. Or do principles, evidence and the truth make you gag?<br /><br />There is no lack of clarity around the issue confronting you, or in which posts it is covered. Simply acting as a parrot for the side-stepping remarks of your crony, Holyer, does not make you look very bright. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-20657966066032311132014-03-23T18:13:47.372+00:002014-03-23T18:13:47.372+00:00Anon 4:52,
I recognise you by your syntax, vocabu...Anon 4:52,<br /><br />I recognise you by your syntax, vocabulary, vacuity, tone and style. But I'm busy right now, do you mind if I come back and insult you later. John Holyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02284672912775316883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-80680085520425420192014-03-23T18:11:57.177+00:002014-03-23T18:11:57.177+00:00How bizarre for we have anons arguing with anons, ...How bizarre for we have anons arguing with anons, anons claiming they are not other anons, anons disowning comments they previously claimed and now, to top it all, an anon claiming he is attacked by name when he has not got one. All very weird, but there are some strange anons out there.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17927801279761727020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-92074595899913038272014-03-23T17:45:49.436+00:002014-03-23T17:45:49.436+00:00Of the 100's of anti-Manston comments on this ...Of the 100's of anti-Manston comments on this blog over the past few days, only "Tim Clark" hasn't hidden behind anonymity (though I doubt if that's his real name!). So I wonder how many different people here are really against it? No more than 5 or 6 I suspect.<br /><br />As for BHS closing, it was pretty obvious that someone else would take over the site fairly quickly. A bit difference to the decades of decaying concrete that we'll see (and our grandchildren will see) if Manston closes. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-31284377446261757102014-03-23T17:41:34.323+00:002014-03-23T17:41:34.323+00:00Only one person attacks me by name every time I ma...Only one person attacks me by name every time I make a comment and that same person invents stories about me maligning Cllr Worrow. Whilst I am no fan of Worrow's I did not join in the rejoicing at his arrest, Anon whoever you are, so you are still a liar. Please sue me if you can prove otherwise. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-43282780056964077302014-03-23T16:52:03.797+00:002014-03-23T16:52:03.797+00:00I agree with you, Holyer, that posting anonymously...I agree with you, Holyer, that posting anonymously does create a recognition problem. But nowhere do I even vaguely suggest that everyone is wrong but me. I don't happen to think that, and would prefer to leave that sort of arrogance to your good, well practiced self. <br /><br />Anon 3.27, take care when you hurl the term "liar"; you might find yourself as embarrassed as Town Councillor Epps. I have re-checked the posts and those listed are definitely mine. Unless you are claiming the one which prompted a critic to call me a "disgusting little creep" in reply; you would be welcome to that one. I fear you are mistaken, or being mischievous.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-3215952985972984942014-03-23T16:17:21.136+00:002014-03-23T16:17:21.136+00:00Oh dear! Off we go once more with anon arguing wit...Oh dear! Off we go once more with anon arguing with anon who is not the same anon as the anon who said that everyone has got wrong but him.John Holyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02284672912775316883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-17255156003489423032014-03-23T15:27:22.110+00:002014-03-23T15:27:22.110+00:00You're a liar 2:23, because two of the posts y...You're a liar 2:23, because two of the posts you listed are MINE!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-32641578743472509552014-03-23T14:23:48.877+00:002014-03-23T14:23:48.877+00:00To Anon 1.13, sorry, my name isn't John either...To Anon 1.13, sorry, my name isn't John either. To Anon of 1.15, I don't think that's Epps's issue or problem - certainly not one he's raised. But my posts in this thread are, in order, those timed at 5.37, 12.09, 1.35 and 1.02 - and now this one. That should clear up any doubt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-35866757813670778272014-03-23T13:15:05.781+00:002014-03-23T13:15:05.781+00:001:02, how is William (or anyone else) supposed to ...1:02, how is William (or anyone else) supposed to know which anon they're talking to? You obviously haven't really thought this through...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-88062166223268781682014-03-23T13:13:48.840+00:002014-03-23T13:13:48.840+00:00Thanks John.Thanks John.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-57771340454467935332014-03-23T13:02:22.624+00:002014-03-23T13:02:22.624+00:00Town Councillor Epps, firstly my name isn’t Tim, s...Town Councillor Epps, firstly my name isn’t Tim, so I don’t understand the basis for your last contribution or your reference to excuses being made up for you (sounds intriguing though!). Secondly, others may well not know what I am talking about here. That isn’t an issue for me, as my remarks have been addressed solely to you.<br /><br />I have been referring back to “the salacious, gossipy contributions you…made [late last year] and the titillation you and your cronies…clearly experienced [over news of the arrest of John Worrow]” <br /> <br />On this blog, this week, you said:<br /><br />“I never made any comment about that arrest”.<br /><br />On Thanetonline, in a strand dated 30 October (2013), you said after someone asked what was the latest news about John Worrow:<br /><br />“Look in the Gazette… Yet to get my copy but the phone has been buzzing this morning at the news”<br /><br />When someone then queried why the subsequent “conversation” wasn’t about John Worrow, and suggested it should be, you said:<br /><br />“True…, but no juicy details yet. Have you heard anything on your grapevine for no-one I have spoken to knows any more than was in the Gazette? Be interesting to see if he [John Worrow] still shouts “criminal” across the Council Chamber at Ken Gregory after this.”<br /><br />When someone mentioned the presumption of innocence before proven guilt, you said:<br /><br />“Seem to recall many people were not so generous…when Sandy Ezekiel was arrested and Ken Gregory only accepted a police caution. He was never tried and convicted by a court of law yet certain councillors still dubbed him a criminal. As you say, though, we must not prejudge.”<br /><br />You went on, about John Worrow:<br /><br />“Bit like his story now that he is standing down, not because he would be kicked out by the electorate, but because he is a victim of a homophobic hate campaign.”<br /><br />So far from making no comment, you were singing like a ****ing canary, and probably almost having a little private accident due to your excitement at the “juicy” news.<br /><br />You then said, about the Sologays blog:<br /><br />“I tried to point this out to [Sologays] on his site, but I am not one of the accepted persons – perhaps I should be glad about that."<br /><br />I wonder what that last little bit means.<br /><br />I challenged you about all of this, here, on this blog, in the February strand headed “Faecebook”. I asked you to apologise for calling ME a liar. But you disappeared.<br /><br />Now you are back, apparently as forgetful, or mendacious, as you were back in February.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20691138.post-83795997955820129662014-03-22T18:42:53.003+00:002014-03-22T18:42:53.003+00:00Tim, you may not forget the excuses you made up fo...Tim, you may not forget the excuses you made up for me, but most people do not even know what you are talking about. As for me and my cronies, as you put it, talking about John Worrow's arrest, you seriously have your wires crossed. I never made any comment about that arrest preferring to let the law and enquiries take their course before leaping into print.<br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17927801279761727020noreply@blogger.com